Who Should NEVER Start a VC Fund? | Sam Huleatt | Superclusters | S7E3

sam huleatt

“Lower barriers to entry doesn’t mean higher probabilities of success.” — Sam Huleatt

Sam Huleatt is the co-founder of The Side Letter, a platform driving network-based research for capital allocators. Prior to The Side Letter, he created and ran the The LP Institute at VC Lab, as well as let On Deck Angels at On Deck. Moreover, he’s a serial founder, active angel investor in over 35 companies, and an active allocator in emerging fund managers, including the likes of Notation Capital, Orange Fund, Inuka Capital, Asylum Capital, and more.

You can find Sam on his socials here:
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/samhuleatt/
X / Twitter: https://x.com/samhuleatt

Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also watch the episode on YouTube here.

OUTLINE:

[00:00] Intro
[01:34] Sam’s childhood
[03:24] The most persistent myth about Sam he never bothered to correct
[05:47] Bottom-up vs top-down investor
[13:37] Can career VCs develop empathy for the founder?
[18:43] Traits of someone who should definitely start a fund
[26:45] Traits of someone who should NEVER start a fund
[28:09] Air of inevitability
[33:44] Why was Outlander VC inevitable?
[36:11] Where should 60% of your Fund I capital come from?
[41:47] Starting a VC fund is hard
[44:46] Do LPs like GP accelerators?
[51:35] Top 3 considerations for first-time LPs
[58:03] How many GPs should 1st-time LPs meet?
[1:01:06] Governing law of VC: Adverse selection
[1:04:40] Incentive alignment on fees
[1:06:36] Terms in LPAs vs side letters
[1:11:16] What is The Side Letter?

SELECT LINKS FROM THIS EPISODE:

SELECT QUOTES FROM THIS EPISODE:

“A career VC has a lot more experience having been on boards. And because of that, because they’ve been a career VC, they’ve seen more companies operating at scale and the issues that come into play in those cases, whereas operators-turned-GPs often have a narrow aperture because they’ve spent most of their career at one or two companies. On the one hand, the operator-GP obviously has a lot of empathy for founders because they’ve been that founder, but they probably haven’t experienced all of the difficult issues that come up as companies scale across lots of different environments. Career VCs have.” — Sam Huleatt

“The best investors have an air of inevitability. It’s not asking for permission or doing something because it’s perceived to be high status.” — Sam Huleatt

“Lower barriers to entry doesn’t mean higher probabilities of success.” — Sam Huleatt

“Most people, after starting a fund, should assume that 60% of that Fund I—you should raise that from first-degree connections—people you already know. It may not be easy, but if you don’t have a network that’s large enough or has those resources, you either need to reconsider your fund target size or maybe you need to spend more time building your network before you start to go out and do that raise.” — Sam Huleatt

“If you don’t have an edge going into [a GP] accelerator, you’re certainly not going to find an edge in the accelerator.” — Sam Huleatt

“Why do the best GPs in the world want you to be on the cap table? A lot of people forget that a key aspect of venture is not just picking, but being picked. That’s true for LPs and it’s true for GPs.” — Sam Huleatt

If you somehow made it to the bottom of these show notes, I’m also trying a new experiment where I write my reactions to the episode on my second blog, Superclusters After Hours. For Sam’s episode, you can find my reactions here.


Follow David Zhou for more Superclusters content:
For podcast show notes: https://cupofzhou.com/superclusters
Follow David Zhou’s blog: https://cupofzhou.com
Follow Superclusters on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SuperclustersLP
Follow Superclusters on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@super.clusters
Follow Superclusters on Instagram: https://instagram.com/super.clusters


Stay up to date with the weekly cup of cognitive adventures inside venture capital and startups, as well as cataloging the history of tomorrow through the bookmarks of yesterday!


The views expressed on this blogpost are for informational purposes only. None of the views expressed herein constitute legal, investment, business, or tax advice. Any allusions or references to funds or companies are for illustrative purposes only, and should not be relied upon as investment recommendations. Consult a professional investment advisor prior to making any investment decisions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *